Appendix E

Hazard Vulnerability Analysis 

This represents MSU’s internal analysis of potential hazards, their relative likelihood and potential relative impact as perceived by respectively the Emergency Management Committee and the University Services Directors (i.e., Dir University Police; Dir Safety & Risk Management; Dir Facilities Services; Dir Facilities Planning Design & Construction).

A. HVA – BY UNIVERSITY SERVICES DIRECTORS - MAY 17, 2013
Ranking Relative to Likelihood

1. Crime/Violence  6. Organizational Misdeeds
2. Technology/Utility Disruption  7. Fire/Explosion
3. HazMat Incident  8. Severe Weather
4. Reputational Risk  9. Civil Protest
5. Medical/Pandemic 10. Earthquake

 

Ranking Relative to Impact

1. Earthquake 6. Fire/Explosion
2. Reputational Risk 7. Technology/Utility Disruption
3. (Tie) Crime/Violence 8. Organizational Misdeeds
4. (Tie) Severe Weather 9. HazMat Incident
5. (Tie) Medical/Pandemic 10. Civil Protest

 

HVA Combined Priority Ranking 

1. Crime 6. Earthquake
2. Reputational Risk 7. HazMat Incident
3. Medical/Pandemic 8. Fire/Explosion
4. Technology/Utility Disruption 9. Organizational Misdeeds
5. Severe Weather 10. Civil Protest

 

B. HVA – BY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE – JUNE 12, 2013

Ranking Relative to Likelihood

1. Reputational Risk 6. HazMat Incident
2. Technology/Utility Disruption 7. Fire/Explosion
3. Crime/Violence 8. Civil Protest
4. Severe Weather 9. Organizational Misdeeds
5. Medical/Pandemic 10. Earthquake

 

Ranking Relative to Impact 

1. Reputational Risk 6. Technology/Utility Disruption
2. Medical/Pandemic 7. Organizational Misdeeds
3. Earthquake 8. HazMat Incident
4. Crime/Violence 9. Severe Weather
5. Fire/Explosion 10. Civil Protest

 

HVA Combined Priority Ranking 

1. Reputational Risk 6. Severe Weather
2. Crime/Violence 7. Earthquake
3. Medical/Pandemic 8. HazMat Incident
4. Technology/Utility Disruption 9. Organizational Misdeeds
5. Fire/Explosion 10. Civil Protest