University Graduate Council Minutes
Wednesday, October 9, 2024
9:30 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.
LJH 325
Council in Attendance:
Marc Giullian (Business)
Rollin Beamish (Arts)
Ezgi Balkanay (Architecture)
Kari Perry (Student Representative)
Craig Ogilvie (Dean of The Graduate School)
Brennan Reeves (Office of International Programs)
Katey Franklin (Health & Human Development)
Amy Reines (Sciences)
Sweeney Windchief (Education)
Ryan Thum (Agriculture)
Sarah Mannheimer (Library)
Also in Attendance:
Emily Peters (Graduate School)
Lauren Cerretti (Graduate School)
Holly Hillis (Graduate School)
Olivia Hayes (Montana Department of Labor & Industry)
Amy Watson (Montana Department of Labor & Industry)
Absent
Akash Gulati (Student Representative)
Wade Hill (Nursing)
Anna French (Student Representative)
Catherine Dunlop (Letters)
Rob Maher (Faculty Senate)
Stephan Warnat (Engineering)
Meeting started at 9:30 a.m.
New Business
- Economic Impact of MSU Graduate Students (Olivia Hayes and Amy Watson, Montana Department of Labor & Industry)
-
- Overview of Economic Report: workforce outcomes of MSU Graduate School and their contribution to the statewide workforce supply
-
- Comments/Questions
-
-
- Incumbent v non-incumber workers (fig. 7, would be interesting to look at by graduate program
-
-
-
- Professional and technical services category includes accounting, architecture, computer science, etc.
-
-
-
- Low salary for Physics (e.g., fig. 10) attributed to students that graduated with master’s but are continuing with PhD, still students
-
-
-
- Majority of engineering students staying in Montana
-
-
-
- Degree categories don’t perfectly match MSU’s degrees because the categories capture all degree programs across the state
-
-
-
- MSSE example, many students are not in the state, so shows over demand— does not factor in students working outside of the state
-
-
-
- High demand for nursing, education
-
-
-
- Not meeting statewide demand for history
-
-
-
- Guage demand is determined by records of what occupations graduates end up in, annual job opening for those industries
-
-
-
-
- Data excludes fields unrelated to the degree; example: employment in restaurant would be excluded
-
-
-
-
- Differences in counseling programs (school counseling vs. LCPC licensure) programs not separated in supply and demand data
-
-
-
- Is the demand data specific to MSU’s supply, or is it statewide demand?
-
-
-
-
- Is demand for the state, including all state institutions’ supply
-
-
-
- If you see individual discrepancies, send that feedback to Olivia and Amy
-
- Consider what we should be doing to help support our graduate students, what programs should we be investing in?
-
-
- Mostly not meeting needs, especially in Eastern Montana
-
-
-
-
- Online programs, connecting with chamber of commerce in other parts of the state
-
-
-
-
-
- Connecting with extension projects beyond agriculture
-
-
-
-
-
- Help students have an awareness of the demand in other parts of the state
-
-
-
- Statewide report available online
- Statewide report available online
August 28, 2024 minutes
- Motion to approve by Thum, Beamish 2nd, 6 in favor, 0 opposed, 1 abstention
Announcements
- Update from the Dean
-
- Accreditation visit today and tomorrow
-
-
- Could request to meet with UGC members
-
-
- Wellness Week: Nourish to Flourish Oct 7-11
-
-
- Tomorrow is a free graduate community dinner at Rendezvous, sponsored by Grad School
-
-
- Upcoming UGC meeting presentations:
-
-
- October 23: Counseling & Psychological Services
-
-
-
- November 6: Graduate Student representatives
-
-
-
- December 4: Housing
- December 4: Housing
-
Old Business
- 1 cr ext and in absentia graduation policy
-
- Review of policy; most recent change added a line that the student must obtain agreement from chair and committee
-
- Discussion
-
-
- Full committee will be required to sign the graduation application?
-
-
-
-
- Policy rather than practice, procedure to be determined
-
-
-
-
-
- Suggest the committee approval could handled in the department and then moved forward
-
-
-
-
- Approval of members is important to address the contract concerns
-
-
- Sweeney motions to approve, Thum seconds
-
-
- Vote: 7 in favor, 0 opposed, 0 abstained
-
-
-
- Motion passes to approve 1 cr ext and in absentia graduation policy
-
-
-
-
- Policy will move to JAGS
- Policy will move to JAGS
-
-
- Appeals Policy
-
- Science: concern from some departments regarding admissions appeals, feel the department’s recommendation not to admit a student shouldn’t be overturned.
-
-
- The admissions appeal process already exists. Policy provides transparency on the process.
-
-
-
- Consensus that there must be a process for students to appeal decisions
-
-
-
- Appeals also provide a necessary step in cases of legal challenges
-
-
- EHHD: not in support of a subcommittee for appeals on academic decisions, did not support a graduate student being on the committee due to FERPA, suggest graduate Dean consult with college dean instead
-
-
- Discussion on FERPA requirements
-
-
-
- Council previously approved a policy that sent the decision directly to Graduate Dean. Academic Council provided feedback that there should be intermediate steps.
-
-
-
-
- Updated policy outlines the intermediate step of appealing to the college Dean first. The Graduate Dean could then review the appeal without a subcommittee, but should consult with the college dean, graduate student leaders, committee, etc., as applicable.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Still provides 1 step intermediary step
-
-
-
-
- Ag: also had some feedback that having another subcommittee review seems unnecessary
-
- Student reps: from the student perspective, supported the subcommittee, more supportive for students, less top-down decisions
-
-
- Feedback against a subcommittee was that the Academic Dean has already done a thorough investigation and has thorough knowledge of the situation, as well as of the profession
-
-
- Would it be helpful for UGC to get annual report of the types of appeals seen in the academic year
-
-
- Would be helpful to have a sense of how often these occur
-
-
- Current text does not require meeting with the student, this could be added to the text
-
- Return to policy subcommittee to remove subcommittee language, add language that student
should meet with the department head and Graduate Dean
- Return to policy subcommittee to remove subcommittee language, add language that student
should meet with the department head and Graduate Dean
- Doctoral and Advisor Committee Deadline
-
- Feedback from last meeting did not support the change, GS staff reviewing the policy
-
- Sense from last time that Council supported leaving the policy as it currently is
-
-
- Trying to establish compromise to move chair deadline to by end of 2nd semester, leaving committee deadline the same
- Trying to establish compromise to move chair deadline to by end of 2nd semester, leaving committee deadline the same
-
- Failed Comprehensive/Defense Exam Policy
-
- Pending language review from JAGS
Updates from subcommittees
- Curriculum subcommittee: discussion on review status
- Governance subcommittee: discussion on status of student representatives
Public comment
Adjourned at 11:00 am
Next scheduled meeting – October 23, 2024