Electronic Accessibility Rubric
Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that our courses ensure equal access and opportunity for people with disabilities. How we can do this is by understanding and implementing acts outlined by the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, a set of international standards developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) to make web content more accessible to people with disabilities. WCAG 2.1 builds on WCAG 2.0 by addressing more accessibility needs—especially for users with low vision, cognitive and learning disabilities, and mobile users.
The rubric below can be used to reference various accessibility standards, expectations, and tools to be incorporated into classrooms to improve accessibility. You can find more detailed explanations of these tools on the Best Practices Page on this site, or by visiting the MSU Library's Accessibility Page.
There are many accessibility tools and concepts we can apply in our classrooms, and it can be easy to get overwhelmed—try to select one or two to focus on at a time. Later, when you’re feeling comfortable with these and are ready to add in a new concept, choose another from the rubric.
Accessibility is a process and progression; each step we take moves us closer to a more accessible and supportive campus.
*Note that this rubric is not an exhaustive list of accessibility tools. You may need to include additional or alternative tools to ensure that your courses are fully accessible.
WCAG Core Principles: POUR
WCAG 2.1 is organized around four key principles, often abbreviated as POUR:
Information and user interface components must be presentable to users in ways they can perceive.
- Text alternatives: Provide alt text for images, captions for videos, and transcripts for audio.
- Adaptable content: Ensure content can be presented in different ways (e.g., simpler layout) without losing meaning.
- Distinguishable: Make it easier for users to see and hear content (e.g., sufficient color contrast, text resizing).
User interface components and navigation must be operable.
- Keyboard accessible: All functionality should be available from a keyboard.
- Enough time: Provide users enough time to read and interact with content.
- Seizure and physical reaction safety: Avoid content that flashes more than 3 times per second.
- Navigable: Provide clear navigation and ways to find content (e.g., headings, consistent menus).
Information and operation of the user interface must be understandable.
- Readable: Use clear and simple language where possible.
- Predictable: Make web pages operate in predictable ways.
- Input assistance: Help users avoid and correct mistakes (e.g., error suggestions and labels in forms).
Content must be robust enough that it can be interpreted reliably by a wide variety of user agents, including assistive technologies.
- Compatible: Maximize compatibility with current and future technologies (e.g., proper HTML markup).
WCAG 2.1 Levels of Conformance
There are three levels of conformance:
- Level A (minimum)
- Level AA (mid-range, and most commonly used as a legal/organizational standard)
- Level AAA (maximum accessibility)
Content Type |
Basic |
Level A |
Level AA |
Level AAA |
Microsoft Word |
|
|
|
|
Microsoft PowerPoint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canvas |
|
|
|
|
Multimedia (video, audio, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
Math Content |
|
|
|
|
Complex Images, Charts, Graphs, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Tables |
|
|
|
|
Web Content |
|
|
|
|
Notes:
-
Basic = Good starting habits even if you don't meet WCAG formally.
-
Level A = Minimum legal standard in many institutions.
-
Level AA = Recommended standard for most universities and public websites.
-
Level AAA = Ideal but difficult to meet in full—aim to implement where feasible.