MSU FACULTY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES November 6, 2002 Members Present: Gipp, Sherwood for Giroux, Kommers, Metz for Linker, Leech, Taylor, Howard, Stewart, Jones, Yoo, Nehrir, Conant, McMahon, Cloninger for Amend, Levy, Bogar, Jelinski, Idzerda, Pratt, Fisher, Lynes-Hayes, Prawdzienski, Kempcke, Knight. Members Absent: Young, Morrill, Engel, White, Anderson, Schlotzhauer, Chem Engr, Lefcort, Locke, Engl, Bond, Lynch, Hoffman. Others Present: Dooley, Fedock, Rimpau. The meeting was called to order by Faculty Council Chair Richard Howard. A quorum was present. The minutes of the October 30, 2002, meeting were approved as distributed. There was no Chair's report. Nominating Committee report. - There are three nominations for a faculty vacancy on the Athletics Committee: Susan Capalbo (Ag Econ/Econ), John Sears (Chem Engineering), and Richard Wojtowicz (Libraries). There were no further nominations from the floor. John Sherwood moved the three nominations, from which one will be appointed, be forwarded to President Gamble. The motion was seconded and carried. - There is one nomination for a position on the Salary Review Committee: Dennis Aig, Media and Theatre Arts. The term ends in December, 2005. As there were no further nominations, Jack Jelinski moved the nomination be forwarded to Provost Dooley for appointment. The motion was seconded and carried. - A new committee, the Office of Facilities Services Advisory Committee, has been approved by President Gamble. Two faculty nominations for two positions are being solicited. Nominations are to be made to Vicky York, Chair of the UGC Nominating Committee, by November 13. Faculty Affairs Committee report - Walter Metz. - Notice of an amendment to Faculty Handbook Section 1312.00 (Conciliation and Grievance Complaints - Deadline for Filing) will be given to faculty through the November 12 STAFF BULLETIN and comment is invited during the following ten-day period. The proposal may be viewed at http://www2.montana.edu/facultycouncil/ . The proposal will then return to Faculty Council for any further discussion and approval to forward to the administration. - The committee proposes an amendment to Faculty Handbook Section 620.00 (Role, Scope, Criteria, Standards, and Procedures Documents). It will be considered at tomorrow's UGC Steering Committee meeting. - The committee is reviewing changes suggested by the academic deans to the post-tenure review proposal (Faculty Handbook Section 618.00-02 and related sections). It is anticipated the proposal will be forwarded to UGC Steering Committee on November 14. UPBAC process and its relationship to Strategic Planning Committee; support role of Office of Planning and Analysis - Dave Dooley and Jim Rimpau. - This semester's goal for the University Planning, Budget and Analysis Committee is to consider university priorities, before beginning work on the two-year budget in February. The intent is to develop a set of priorities, discuss them with the campus to get feedback, and refine them before consideration of the budget begins. A balanced budget is to be presented to President Gamble in April. - The SPC was asked to provide information to UPBAC to help make decisions about priorities. SPC was to specifically address the optimal size for MSU (total student enrollment, breakdown between undergraduates and graduates, etc.) and to prepare an analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. - The documents from SPC will provide part of the information to be considered by UPBAC, but UPBAC reserves the right to set priorities for the university. - The two SPC documents, Capacity for Growth and SWOT Analysis, (http://www.montana.edu/upba/spc/documents/index.html) were accepted by UPBAC and have been discussed at two public meetings. A sub-committee of UPBAC is drafting a response to the documents. It will be discussed by UPBAC. - During discussion, it was suggested that concern regarding the SPC documents may partly arise from the reporting of the UPBAC meeting rather than from the documents themselves. Sections of the documents that may be controversial depend upon the perspective of the reader. SPC provided some thoughtful analysis and has provided a basis for dialogue. - There are two different methods for UPBAC to use in moving forward in setting priorities: identify areas of strength, excellence, centrality, and list the areas by name; or develop sets of measures (such as demand, needs of the state, tradition, ability to gain external funds) and invest in areas that do well according to these measures. If "excellence" is to be used, everyone needs to know what measures are being used. - Last year, UPBAC used departmental KPI's to help set priorities. - According to Jim Rimpau, the focus of institutional research has changed and now includes planning, also. The Office of Planning and Analysis provides both data expertise and analysis. Long-term data collection tasks of the office include collecting KPI's for the past ten years. This year, the context for this data will be the Delaware Study, which allows comparisons of cost and productivity. - Challenges of data collection and analysis by the Office of Planning and Analysis include the quality of the data that can be collected (the change to Banner making it more difficult), providing more access to data, and changing the MSU culture to be more aggressive in requesting data. - There will be a study of the capacity for growth at MSU. What kind of growth is possible and desirable and where can it take place? - If Faculty Council committees have data needs, they should not hesitate to contact the Office for Planning and Analysis. As there was no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:00 PM. Joann Amend, Secretary Richard Howard, Chair